Languages

You are here

Pedagogical Ideas of N. Novikov and Their Place in the Area of Educational Views of the Second Half of XVIII Century

Научные исследования: 
Выпуски: 

 

For citation: Cherepneva L.M. (2020) Pedagogicheskie idei N.I. Novikova i ih mesto v srede [[prosvetitel'skih vozzrenij vtoroj poloviny XVIII stoletija [Pedagogical Ideas of N. Novikov and Their Place in the Area of Educational Views of the Second Half of XVIII Century]. Mediaskop 2. Available at: http://www.mediascope.ru/2625
DOI: 10.30547/mediascope.2.2020.9

 

@ Ljudmila M. Cherepneva

PhD Student at the Chair of History of Russian Literature and Journalism, Faculty of Journalism, Lomonosov Moscow State University (Moscow, Russia), cherepnyova@yandex.ru

 

Abstract

The article is focused on the analyzing of the pedagogical views, expressed by N. Novikov – a famous Russian publisher, journalist and educationist. Our main target was to examine these ideas not only as Novikov’s educational concept, but as a part of the package of educational and enlightening ideas, that had been developed in the second part of the XVIII century. As far as we focused on the humanistic pedagogical approach, our dominant problem was to compare two educational concepts – by I. Betskoy and by N. Novikov – in order to understand their similarities and differences. So, the main researching method, which we used, was a comparative analysis. The choice of Betskoy’s works, that we made, was not a random one. We found that very interesting to compare these two enlightening systems (by Betskoy and by Novikov) due to the fact that they were very characteristic. The first conception had been developed with the support of the Russian empress Catherine the Great, while the second had been private. This condition predetermined their focuses on the different audiences. In our opinion, that was important to understand, that, despite the observed circumstances, the mentioned educational concepts appeared to be ideologically close.

Keywords: Magazine ‘Pribavlenie k Moskovskim vedomostyam ’, N. Novikov, I. Betskoi, Russian pedagogics, pedagogical idea.

 

Notes

Antologija pedagogicheskoj mysli Rossii XVIII v. [Anthology of Russian Pedagogical Thought in the XVIII Century]. Moscow: Pedagogika Publ., 1985. Available at: http://pedagogic.ru/books/item/f00/s00/z0000026/st023.shtml (accessed: 15.09.2019).

Detskoe chtenie dlja serdca i razuma. 1785. Part IV. L. VI, VII; 1787. Part. IX. Pp. 207‒208.

Ejdel'man N.Ja. Poslednij letopisec[The Last Chronicler]. Part I. Available at: http://vivovoco.astronet.ru/VV/PAPERS/NYE/KAR/KAR_1.HTM#0011 (accessed:  15.09.2019).

General'nyj plan Imperatorskogo Vospitatel'nogo, dlja prinosnyh detej, doma i gospitalja dlja bednyh rodil'nic v Moskve. (1763‒1767 gg.): v 3 ch. [General Plan of the Imperial Educational Center for Poor Children, Home and Hospital for Poor Maternity Hospitals in Moscow. (1763‒1767): in 3 vol.]. Sankt-Peterburg, 1889. P. 1.

Pribavlenie. 1783, no. 2, 6, 9, 12, 15, 18, 21, 24, 28, 34, 82‒94; 1784, no. 51, 52, no. 54‒56, 56‒59.

 

 

References

Frumenkova T.G. (2009) Ekaterina II i I.I. Beckoj (1762‒1763 gg.) [Catherine II and I. Betskoy (1762‒1763)]. Vestnik Gercenovskogo universiteta 1 (63): 70‒75.

Kapterev P.F. (1915) Istorija russkoj pedagogii[History of Russian pedagogics. 2nd ed.]. Petersburg: [n. p.].

Kudrjavceva E.B. (2010) Dlja serdca i razuma: Detskaja literatura v Rossii XVIII v. [For Heart and Mind: Children’s Literature in Russia of XVIII Century]. Sankt-Peterburg: Nestor-Istorija Publ.

Vologina E.V. Stanovlenie detskoj periodiki v Rossii: transformacija izdatel'skoj modeli: dis. ... kand. filol. nauk [Formation of Children’s Periodicals in Russia: Transformation of Publishing Model: PhD … philol. sci. diss.]. Krasnodar, 2011.

Zueva M.A. (2013) Sozdanie i dejatel'nost' komissii narodnyh uchilishh pri Ekaterine II [Establishment and Activity of the Commission of People 's Schools under Catherine II]. Vestnik Chuvashskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta im. I.Ja. Jakovleva, no.1 (77), part 2, pp. 83‒89.